Readers of the Golf-Patents blog know that there is a fair share of patent litigation in the golf industry. Further, the validity of the patent-in-suit is always brought into question, primarily by one of the parties producing prior art that was not considered by the US Patent and Trademark Office when it issued the patent. Thus, every year many illegitimate patent applications make their way through the US patent examination process without adequate review. The problem is particularly acute in the golf industry where the history of prior inventions (often called “prior art”) is widely distributed and poorly documented. In other words, a majority of golf industry prior art, whether it be clubs, balls, GPS range finders, training devices, etc. is not easily searchable in a nice library or convenient database. The reason is that a significant part of golf industry prior art consists of products that were not patented. For instance, very few, if any of the component club manufacturers patented their club designs; which often happen to be the most radical designs that gain mainstream acceptance years later. So how does a person find a component club catalog from 1982 containing a particularly relevant piece of prior art? Or how does one find that a particular golf product was sold in Japan five years before a patent application was filed in the US? The answer is the Golf-Patents.com Bounty Hunter Program. The goal of the Bounty Hunter Program is to tap into the knowledge of all hardcore golf enthusiasts and .....
<< MORE >>