Finally, Just What Every Golfer Has Been Waiting For….. The Golf Club Urinal

I recently saw a post on a golf blog about the UROClub and chuckled (sorry, can’t recall which blog it was). Then almost fell out of my chair when a few weeks later I came across a published patent application on the device. The patent application published as US Pub. No. 20080127402 titled “Urinal Apparatus Including a Simulated Golf Club” and describes the invention as….. Check out these drawings….. I know that it is probably 100 percent spill-proof, but I am not comfortable risking any spillage on my grips or bag. (Perhaps when I am older) Although, the fact that it was invented by a urologist does give the product an extra level of credibility, but $50! It would make a good gag gift for the senior golfer in your life.

Read more

Yet Another Swing Training Aid…. Yet Another One That I Would Try At Least Once

I often wonder, “is there money to be made in golf training products?” There must be because the number of golf training aid patent applications is through the roof! A recent training aid patent application published as US Pub. No. 20080139332 titled “Golf Training Aid,” and describes the invention as…. The following drawings do a better job of explaining the invention….. I would try it, but wouldn’t buy it.

Read more

Some Golf Club Inventions Make Me Shake My Head and Say…. Even If It Were USGA Conforming, There is No Way This Club Would Help My Game

That is just what I said when I came across one rather unique golf club disclosed in recently published patent application US Pub. No. 20080132349 titled “Golf Club Head having Concavely Curved Face.” Check out these drawings!….. The application describes the invention as….. Do you think this club would help your game?

Read more

A Look Inside the Callaway versus Acushnet Golf CLUB Patent Infringement Litigation

Most non-lawyers are blown away by the costs of patent litigation. Ever wonder why litigation is so expensive? Aside from the filing of motion, after motion, after motion….. the real
costs of patent litigation are associated with the “discovery” efforts of the parties…… (background on what “discovery” is)….. So now with the understanding that the case is deep in the discovery period, check out this list of information that Acushnet wants to learn from Callaway (and think about the costs associated with gathering and digesting all this information)….. I love #38! I am sure Callaway is just going to cough-up the “market factors” that drive the sales of their products…..

Read more

A New Callaway Fairway Wood? Perhaps

A few weeks ago a Callaway design patent issued that made me scratch my head and say “what club is that…. I don’t immediately recognize it so it must be one for the ladies or the juniors.” Well, I still don’t know, but it definitely has a sole configuration unlike any clubs they currently have in the US market. It may the design of new product offering. The patent is USPN D569941 titled “Golf Club Sole.” Check out this sole design…..

Read more

Acushnet’s Attempt to Counter the Counterfeit Golf Ball Industry

How do you know if your expensive golf balls are authentic? Well, aside from any questionable blemishes in the cover, you probably don’t. Apparently Acushnet’s engineers and scientists
have been working on developing a solution to this problem. This week an Acushnet patent application published as US Pub. No. 20080139342 titled “Anti-Counterfeiting System Using Compound Additives.” The application describes the invention as….. If you are a fan of golf technology, then you will enjoy reading this patent application. Fascinating stuff! Hopefully this won’t increase the price of golf balls; but I wouldn’t bet on it.

Read more

Is This Callaway Driver Radical Enough for You?

Earlier this week I posted about a Taylor Made patent application disclosing a pretty radical driver with fins. Well, Callaway has stepped up to the plate this week with a patent application disclosing a driver that is even more radical! Check out this Callaway driver design!….. The published patent application that may be giving us a sneak peak at future Callaway drivers published yesterday as US Pub. No. 20080139336 titled “C-Shaped Golf Club Head.” So, will the finned Taylor Made driver or the C-shaped Callaway driver make it to market first?

Read more

The Future of Taylor Made Drivers? Will This Design Ever Make it to Store Shelves?

I never thought I would live to see the day that a Taylor Made driver had fins! OK, I haven’t actually seen fins on a Taylor Made driver; just drawings of a finned driver from a Taylor Made patent application. If a finned Taylor Made driver does make it to market I am sure they will make it look cool and will overwhelm golfers with enough marketing hype that we all end up believing that we can’t live without it. The published patent application, that may be giving us a sneak peak at future Taylor Made drivers, published last week as US Pub. No. 20080132355 titled “Golf Club Head Having Ribs.” Check out these drawings……. Can you believe it?

Read more

A Vibration Reducing Golf Glove…. Sound Pretty Good?

Few golfers ever consider the time and effort that has gone into the design of the golf glove they use and abuse until it is so worn, tattered, and sweat stained that it is callously
discarded in the nearest trash can. Perhaps this post will help you “appreciate” your golf glove as a unique piece of golf technology designed to improve your game, rather than simply that crumbled
up crusty piece of leather and Velcro that is stuffed into your golf bag after the round. Acushnet recently had an interesting golf glove patent application publish as US Pub. No. 20080109934 titled “Vibration Reducing Golf Glove.” The title sounds pretty good, right? The application describes the invention as….. Now, next time you put on your trusty golf glove, look at it affectionately as a piece of technology engineered to improve your game, not just a blister preventer!

Read more

A Second Golf Bag Related Patent Infringement Litigation Case in Less than 2 Months! This Time Bag Boy Takes on Sun Mountain

Last week Dynamic Brands, LLC (doing business as The Bag Boy Company) brought a declaratory judgment action against Sun Mountain Sports regarding Sun Mountain’s patent USPN 7131534 titled “Golf Bag and Strap System.” Click HERE to check out the patent, and click HERE to read the Complaint. It appears the dispute began when Sun Mountain’s counsel sent a letter (click HERE to read) to Bag Boy alleging infringement of the ‘534 patent. Bag Boy then responded with a polite email to Sun Mountain (click HERE to read) inquiring if Sun Mountain would license the patent if indeed Bag Boy was stepping on the patent. In response, Sun Mountain had their attorneys make it clear that licensing the patent is not an option, Sun Mountain wants Bag Boy’s sales of these particular straps to cease immediately and any inventory must be destroyed (click HERE to read). Not surprisingly, Bag Boy then filed a Declaratory Judgment action seeking a declaratory judgment that Bag Boy does not infringe the patent and that the patent is invalid (click HERE to read the Complaint), and Bag Boy sent Sun Mountain a nice letter explaining Bag Boy’s position and letting them know that they have been sued (click HERE to read). Gone are the days of the cease and desist letter; yet some people refuse to accept it, or don’t care about controlling the location of litigation. The patent describes the invention as…..

Read more

Which Young Up & Coming Pro Is Taking the Protection of His Personal Brand Seriously?

Can you guess which young golf pro has filed for trademark protection of his name associated with the following products?….. Golf clubs, golf bags, golf bag covers, golf club head covers, golf bag tags, golf balls, golf ball markers, golf gloves, golf tees, divot repair tools, golf club grips, golf practice mats, golf towels, golf practice nets, golf practice putting cups; toys and dolls, namely, figurines depicting sports celebrity……
Click here for the answer. Looks like he has a good team looking out for his long term financial success. Congratulations!

Read more

Think Karsten Manufacturing May Have Something to Say About this Trademark Application?

A trademark application filed in March is likely to get some attention from Karsten Manufacturing (makers PING brand golf clubs). The application is for the mark _____ _____. The application describes the goods associated with the mark as…… So, does this application pass the common sense test? Do you think the Applicant just might end up facing a lawsuit if they offer these goods under the ____ ____ mark?

Read more

The Tables Turn in the GPS Industry… Yet Another GPS Patent Infringement Case

About one year ago I reported that GPS Industries and Optimal IP Holdings filed a patent infringement lawsuit against 10 defendants that I characterized as reading like a Who’s Who of the golfing GPS world……. Now it is a year later and many of the defendants find themselves listed as defendants in another GPS patent infringement lawsuit; this time filed by Roblor Marketing Group. The defendants listed in this latest lawsuit filed on May 23rd include GPS Industries (the plaintiff in the prior lawsuit), ProShot Investors, ProLink Holdings, ProLink Solutions, IntelliGolf, Karrier Communications, L1 Technologies, Links Point, SkyHawke Technologies, Goodwin Golf Group, and Polaris Golf Systems. You have to wonder how many of the defendants can absorb the financial burden of defending themselves in two patent infringement actions……

Read more

Is the 107th US Open Winner Angel Cabrera a Patent Infringer? All PING Rapture Users May Be…..

Ahh, more golf industry patent infringement litigation; the stuff that makes attorneys smile. The PING Rapture is the latest target of patent infringement allegations. Yesterday VyaTek Sports, Inc. sued Ping, Inc. and Karsten Manufacturing Corporations for allegedly infringing two of VyaTek’s patents. Click HERE to read the actual Complaint. The patents-in-suit are USPNs 7207354 and 7314067, both titled “Design and Manufacturing Method for Multi-Material Tube Structures.” The patents describe the invention as…..

Read more

Interesting Putter UTILITY Patent Issues on a Putter that You May Recognize

On Tuesday an interesting utility patent issued on a pretty popular putter design. OK, “pretty popular” may be a stretch, but it is a pretty “unique”, or distinctive, putter that true
putter aficionados will likely recognize. The patent is USPN 7374497 titled “Golf Putter Head With Visual Alignment System.” Do you recognize the putter brand?….. (figures) …… Click here for what is probably the answer. I say “probably” because the patent is assigned to Sienna Sport Limited of Northern Ireland, not the company that owns the linked website. At first blush the product and the patent seem so similar that I suspect there is a licensing or distribution agreement between the two companies. The patent describes the invention as…..

Read more

A Big Week for Driver Design Patents….. Can You Identify This Driver?

Marketing types always say…. it is all about brand recognition. I suppose “brand recognition” is slightly different than “golf club design patent drawing recognition,” (ok, more than slightly) but
they are not entirely unrelated. The following drawings come from a driver design patent that issued yesterday to one of the big guys. Do you recognize this club?…..

Read more

The Quest for the Perfect Lighted Golf Ball….. Does It Exist?

A truly playable lighted golf ball…. can it be made? I have my doubts. Last week a lighted golf ball patent application published in which the inventor discloses his view of the ideal
lighted golf ball. The application published as US Pub. No. 20080108454 titled “Golf Ball Containing Photoluminescent Material and a Light Source,” which describes the invention as….. Interesting, but my gut tells me that there are a few technical challenges that the inventor will have to overcome.

Read more

Finally, a “Jetdrive” Golf Club Head! Can You Imagine Air Leaving Your Club Head at a “Near Sonic Velocity”?

I am not sure what to say about this golf club patent application titled “Golf Club, Jetdrv Driver for Increased Distance and Accuracy;” other than to say that it is interesting (and it
did not result in a patent being issued). The application published as US Pub. No. 20050032584 and contains the following figures….. The application describes the golf club as follows….. Do you believe it?

Read more

A Putter for the Classic Car Lovers, Especially if You Love the 1957 Chevy

I recently stumbled across a rather interesting putter utility patent that classic car lovers will appreciate. The patent is USPN 5961398 titled “Golf Club Head Apparatus” and looks like the rear of a 1957 Chevy. Check out this putter…. Frankly I am surprised that the inventor obtained a utility patent on this putter since it seems as though the unique attributes are the nonfunctional ornamental design of the putter rather than anything having to do with the utility. Regardless, it is a pretty cool putter!……

Read more

Having Trouble Reading Your Putts? If So, This Invention May Be Just What You Need

Recently a golf related patent application published with the title “Handheld Device for Determining Golf Ball Trajectory for Putt or Chip Shot and Method Therefore;” namely US Pub. No. 20080102989. I am willing to read anything that has a shot at improving my putting, so I jumped right in to see if I felt this invention could help my game. The basic invention looks like this….. So how does it work? Well, the following paragraphs explain the concept with respect to the drawings below….. So, do you think this golf invention could help your putting? I will …..

Read more

Tired of Using a Sweaty Golf Glove? If so, This Invention May be for You

Recently a patent application published with the title “Golf Cart Glove Holder-Dryer” (US Pub. No. 20080083131). OK, interesting title…… you have my attention. The application goes on to describe the invention as….. Not the best description, but the following drawing tells the rest of the story…… Good idea! I would buy a few if I owned my own golf cart.

Read more

Can it Be? A Practical Golf Ball Location System

I love reading patent applications directed to inventions designed to eliminate lost golf balls. Such inventions generally appear very impractical, expensive, or involve technology that would be difficult, or impossible, to incorporate into a golf ball; which is what I expected to find when reading a recently published patent application (namely, US Pub. No. 20080061236 titled “Device for Assisting in Finding an Article”). Upon reading the patent application I was blown away because I found myself saying “this doesn’t seem that impractical, in fact it might be a decent idea and I would consider buying one if it were under $50.” The patent application describes the invention as…..

Read more

Check Out This Golf Tee!

Interesting golf tee inventions do not come along every day. Fortunately last month a patent application published that revealed an interesting tee design. Admittedly, it is not
necessarily a golf tee that I would buy or use, but it is pretty cool nonetheless. The application published as US Pub. No. titled “Self-Righting Golf Ball Tee” and the following drawing says it all…..

Read more

Interesting Patent for Iron Faces Issues to Pixl Golf… Are They Still in Business?

This week an interesting patent issued to a golf company that I did not think was even still in business, namely Pixl Golf (click here for an article on the origins of the company, and click here for a 2003 article on Pixl irons). The patent is USPN 7364513 titled “Golf Club Head with Inserts for Impact Face,” which describes the invention as….. Check out these drawings that nicely illustrate the concept…… Interesting concept, but is it enough to revitalize Pixl Golf?…..

Read more

Holy Mackerel, Could this be the Next New Titleist or Cobra Driver?

Typically when a golf club design patent issues to one of the major equipment players I expect to open it and see a club design that they introduced months ago, but not today. The US Patent and Trademark Office issues patents every Tuesday. Therefore, much of my Tuesday morning is spent reviewing the latest golf related patents, which is always entertaining but rarely do any of the patents really surprise me. Well, today I was surprised by a design patent that issued to Acushnet (a company known for great products under the Titleist and Cobra brands, but not known for wild club designs). Just check out these drawings….. Could this be the next new Titleist or Cobra driver? I can’t wait to see if this design makes it to market……

Read more

How Well Do You Know Fairway Woods?

If you strip all the logos off a golf club head, the typical avid golfer can usually identify the manufacturer of the popular drivers… often the popular irons… and sometimes the popular
putters….. but rarely the fairway woods of the large golf companies. Can you identify the producer of this fairway wood?…..

Read more

Callaway Hyper X and Hyper X Tour Added to the List of Clubs Accused of Infringing Acushnet’s Golf Club Patents

As you may recall from a prior post, on June 8, 2007 Callaway filed a golf club patent infringement lawsuit alleging that Acushnet has willfully infringed 5 Callaway patents. Then, as discussed in a subsequent post, on July 12, 2007 Acushnet filed their Answer to the Complaint thereby stating (i) that Acushnet does not infringe the Callaway patents and alleging that the Callaway patents are invalid, and (ii) returned the favor and accusing Callaway of infringing two of Acushnet’s patents. Callaway responded at the end of August (post here) stating that they do not infringe the Acushnet patents and allege that the Acushnet patents (7041003 and 6960142) are invalid!
Now, Acushnet has filed their Second Amended Answer (read in entirety HERE) to the Callaway Complaint…… The Second Amended Answer adds Callaway’s Hyper X and Hyper X Tour clubs to the list of allegedly infringing products and adds USPN 7140975 to the other two Acushnet patents that they accuse Callaway of infringing. If you like reading about golf club faces having non-concentric zones of differing flexural stiffness, then you will love the ‘975 patent. This leaves me asking myself….. does Callaway produce any drivers that Acushnet does not allege are infringing one of their patents, and does Acushnet produce any drivers that Callaway does not allege are infringing one of their patents?…..

Read more

Can You Imagine Microwave Instructions on a Sleeve of Golf Balls?

Ah, the quest for the perfect golf ball. I keep looking for the one that guarantees to cut my handicap in half. No luck so far. I would never have guessed that the quest may lead me to a golf ball that I microwave to change the phase! Huh? OK, let me explain. Earlier this month Du Pont had a patent application publish titled “Phase Transition Golf Ball and Method of Use”, which caught my eye. Surely it wasn’t the compelling language of the Abstract (seen below) that piqued my interest…… It was the following….. So, do you think we will ever see one of these golf balls on the market?

Read more

Think You Could Buy a Real Cleveland Wedge for $30? It Would be Nice, But Get Real! Cleveland Golf Sues an Alleged Counterfeiter

Last week Roger Cleveland Golf Company, Inc. filed a lawsuit against Guangdong Yuedragon Casting Company, Ltd. (“Yuedragon”) and Jack Dabing Wan (“Wan”) alleging that they produced,
sold, and shipped counterfeit Cleveland wedges to the United States. The following paragraphs from the Complaint do a good job of explaining the events that led up to the lawsuit…..Pretty amazing allegations! How fun would it be to be Cleveland’s “mystery shopper!” Click HERE to read the Complaint, and click HERE to check out the exhibits, which contains some interesting material. Another interesting golf litigation case to watch…..

Read more

John Daly Awarded $2.7 Default Judgment Against Hippo Holdings and Sues Hippo Golf Company

Did you know that on October 17, 2007 John Daly was awarded a $2.7 million default judgment against Hippo Holdings? Unfortunately big John has not received a penny. It turns out that the tumultuous relationship between Daly and Hippo Holdings has been going on since 2000. The “catch” with the default judgment is that it was issued against Hippo Holdings, the legal entity that contracted with John. The present lawsuit asks the Court to pierce the corporate veils of Hippo Holdings and Hippo Golf and permit John to execute the judgment against Hippo Holdings on its “alter ego” Hippo Golf. The Complaint that was filed last week does a great job at summarizing the case, so click HERE to get the dirt on the Daly and Hippo relationship. You would have to be heartless to read the Complaint and not feel bad for John……

Read more

More Patent Infringement Litigation in the Golf Industry….. West Coast Trends Inc. (aka The Makers of Club Glove Travel Bags) Sues Armor Gear for Patent Infringement

The company behind The Club Glove travel bags, which according to their website are the number one travel bags on Tour, have sued Armor Gear alleging infringement of USPN 7219902 titled “Flexible Travel Bag with Integrated Support to Protect Bag from Wear.” The Complaint alleges that Armor Gear’s Big Kahuna, Big Kahuna II, and the Rolling Sherpa IIz bags infringe the ‘902 patent. Click HERE to read the Complaint. The ’902 patent describes the invention as…..

Read more

The IP Golf Guy Discusses “Setting Up a Small Business Intellectual Property Protection System” on the Small Business Advocate® Radio Program

I was honored to be a guest on the nationally syndicated Small Business Advocate® radio show this morning. Jim Blasingame and I discussed how a business, regardless of size, can set up a formal intellectual property protection system to capitalize on the fact that most of their value is found in intangible assets. I have been a fan of Jim’s show for close to 10 years and highly recommend it. You can listen to the interview here…..

Read more

One More Reason to Admire Augusta National – The Trademark Portfolio

In honor of Masters’ week, a look at the trademark portfolio of Augusta National is in order. Would you have guessed that AMEN CORNER is a registered trademark? How about the fact that Augusta National has registered the AUGUSTA trademark for use associated with golf stools and chairs? And the famous map with flagstick trademark is registered for use in association with restaurant services…. and RAE’S CREEK….

Read more

Guess How Many US Patents are Currently “In Force”?

Hello from Washington DC! I am currently attending the ABA’s 23rd Annual Intellectual Property Law Conference in Arlington, Virginia. There is nothing like a party of 600+ patent
attorneys from around the globe, although it is interfering with my blogging and coverage of The Masters! As you can imagine, these conferences are filled with great unusual statistics; one of which is the number of US patents that are currently “in force.” In other words, of the millions of US patents
that have issued, how many are currently enforceable? (i.e. in term and have had the requisite maintenance fees paid)…..

Read more

Will the Court Order an Injunction Regarding Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls? If So, Will the Court Stay the Injunction Pending Acushnet’s Appeal?

…..(case background)….. Roughly at the same time Acushnet also wisely filed a “Contingent Motion to Stay Any Permanent Injunction Pending Appeal,” which you may review HERE. In response Callaway filed an “Opposition” (click HERE to read) to Acushnet’s “Contingent Motion to Stay Any Permanent Injunction Pending Appeal.” Now, Acushnet filed their reply titled “Acushnet’s Reply Brief in Further Support of Its Motion to Stay Any Permanent Injunction,” which may be viewed in the entirety HERE; bringing an end to this auxiliary string of filings and leaving it “ripe” for action by the court. Whew, confusing enough? I have reproduced the entire “Introduction” section of this latest filing below….. OK, so the gloves are off! (as if they have been shadow boxing for the past 2 years) If you haven’t had your fill of analysis regarding Shore D hardness values, and whether hardness should be measured on or off the ball, then I encourage you to read the entire Reply Brief. For those of you without the stomach for technical and legal word play, the “Conclusion” from the Reply Brief is reproduced below…..

Read more

Can You Identify This Putter? Test Your Knowledge of Golf Putter Designs

Boy, a ton of putter design patents have issued recently! As you know, Golf-Patents.com has repeatedly used putter design patents to test your knowledge of putters (click here to satisfy your hunger for putter patent posts). Well this should be a relatively easy one…. How good are you at identifying a particular brand of putter when all the logos and trademarks are stripped off the club head? The figures below come from a US putter design patent that issued recently to a major producer of clubs. Can you identify the brand of putter?

Read more

Patent Issues On The Use of Goose Droppings as Golf Tees

As you are meandering down a perfectly manicured fairway with the sun in your face and the wind at your back, all the while trying to avoid stepping on one of those huge goose turds that litter golf courses like a minefield, have you ever thought to yourself… “boy, I bet one, or perhaps two, of those delightful goose poops, would work great as a golf tee”? Well, that is just the stroke of genius that one inventor recently had and the Patent Office agreed with him. The patent, titled “Method of Using Goose Excrement as a Golf Tee,” describes the invention as…..

Read more

A First on the Golf-Patents Blog… Can You Identify the Maker of this Grip from the Design Patent?

Many golfers would be surprised to learn that majority of golf grips are patented. Some manufacturers apply for utility patents on their unique grip construction and manufacturing
methods, while others merely seek to protect the ornamental look of the grips via design patents. Recently a golf grip design patent issued on a fairly popular grip, can you identify it from the
design patent drawings?

Read more

The PuttingDisc Receives Patent

Familiar with the PuttingDisc? (the website is a little rough) I saw the figures below in a patent that issued this week and thought that I had seen it before, but there is hardly a reference to it on the web (so I must have been mistaken). Oh well, further proof that it is not easy to get a golf training aid to market. The patent is USPN 7347789 titled “golf putting practice device” and describes the invention as….

Read more

Can It Be? A Stocking Stuffer Type Golf Training Aide That Looks Pretty Good…

As a golfer whose game fluctuates from marginal, at best, to horrible (as my playing partners will attest from my first round of 2008 that I played on Thursday), I view most training aides with a skeptical eye. After all, I have tried a lot of things and the only thing that seems to help my game is a lot of time on the range and a lot of rounds. Therefore, I could not believe it when this week a golf training device patent issued and I found myself saying… “not a bad idea; good for use in the backyard, especially if your neighbors won’t put up with the sound of your driver blasting balls into a practice net.” The patent is USPN 7347790 titled “golf swing training device.” The patent describes the invention as…… I describe the invention as……

Read more

Another Golf GPS Range Finder Patent Infringement Lawsuit Update

Boy golfers are passionate about their golf gear! I have been blown away by the number of inquiries I receive regarding the patent litigation surrounding handheld golf GPS range finders. A lot of golfers must be concerned about the future of Natalie’s SkyCaddie endorsement deal.
As you may recall from these prior posts (initial, update 1, update 2, update 3, update 4, and update 5), on May 11th GPS Industries and Optimal IP Holdings filed a patent infringement lawsuit against several defendants (3:07CV0831-K, Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division). GPS Industries then singled out SkyHawke (maker of SkyCaddie) and filed a motion for a preliminary injunction. In response, SkyHawke filed a pretty compelling response to the preliminary injunction motion. The court then denied the preliminary injunction motion.
As I mentioned in my prior post, the case has now entered the slow-motion stage of the litigation, which involves the exchange of a ton of information between the parties that is not filed with the court (and therefore never seen by the readers of Golf-Patents.com). Fortunately we have been given a rare glimpse into the behind the scenes information exchange because the Plaintiffs recently had to request the approval of the court to supplement their initial “preliminary infringement contentions” against L1 Technologies (maker of the iGolf line of products).
The supplemental preliminary infringement contentions related to L1 Technologies contains some fascinating information related to how the Plaintiffs believe the L1 products to be infringing the patent-in-suit…….

Read more

Callaway Golf’s Reply in Support of Their Previous Motion for Permanent Injunction is In! Now the Motion is Fully Briefed and Ready for Action by the Court, PLUS My Prediction

Before delving into the latest filing and disclosing my prediction, a quick summary of the past few months in the Callaway v. Titleist (Acushnet) saga is in order. Back in December a jury found that 8 of the 9 claims in the 4 patents-in-suit were valid, and therefore infringed by Acushnet (click HERE to read the post on the verdict). Then, in mid-January Callaway filed a Motion for Permanent Injunction (click HERE to read the related post) seeking to bring a halt to the production and sale of ProV1’s. Next, Acushnet responded to Callaway’s motion at the end of February (click HERE to read the related post). NOW, Callaway has filed their “reply” in support of the motion for permanent injunction leaving the motion “fully briefed” and ready for action by the court. Pretty exciting!
Readers can view the complete redacted version of Callaway’s “Reply in Support of Callaway Golf Company’s Motion for Permanent Injunction” HERE. The “reply” should be fascinating reading for most golfers. I have to admit that prior to reading this “reply” my gut feeling was that there was a……

Read more

A Couple Tee Time Radio Show Interviews Are Available for Listening

The posts have slowed down in the past week, or so… life, work, and travel have caused the slowdown. Trust me, there are plenty of interesting intellectual property golf topics to report on and the posts should pick up soon. Enough of the excuses, right? OK, recently I noticed that a couple of previously unavailable Tee Time Radio program interviews have become available. You may listen to the December 29th show HERE and the September 22nd show HERE. Enjoy, it is a great show…….

Read more

Nice Patent Reexamination Example from the Golf Industry (A Polite Way of Saying… Here is a Good Example of Competitors Trying to Sink Each Others’ Golf Patents)

It is hard to believe that is has been over a year since I authored a post titled “Bust Your Competitors’ Patents” regarding the patent reexamination process. Since that post many of you have probably learned a little more about the process simply by following my coverage of the Callaway v. Titleist ProV1 golf ball patent dispute. Well, recently a Request for Ex Parte Reexamination was approved by the USPTO regarding a push golf cart design patent, so I thought it would be a good opportunity to share this golf patent reexamination example with the Golf-Patents readers. Back in November a Request for Ex Parte Reexamination was filed regarding USPN D502303 titled “Golf Cart.” The golf cart in question is shown below…….

Read more

Clone Golf Club Makers GigaGolf and KrookedStix Fold to Nike and Agree to Permanent Injunction… King Sports Decides to Fight

As you may recall, back in late December Nike filed a lawsuit taking on the clones (Illinois Northern District Court; 07-c-7108). Specifically, Nike’s December 18th complaint named King Sports, Inc. dba Turbo Power Golf, Hung Ying Chang, Krookedstix, Inc., and Gigagolf, Inc. as defendants. Click HERE to review the prior post. It didn’t take long for GigaGolf and KrookedStix to fold and agree to a Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction with Nike. Click HERE to read the GigaGolf document; and click HERE to read the KroodedStix document. GigaGolf and KroodedStix agreed that they do in fact infringe the Nike design patents and agreed to stop manufacturing and selling the infringing clubs. Interestingly, KroodedStix sold a grand total of “no more than 49 clubs that infringe” the patents-in-suit! King Sports apparently has decided to fight it out and has filed an Answer to the Complaint. Click HERE to read the Answer. To no surprise, King Sports denies infringement and alleges that the patents are invalid. I am not sure I would want to be in the position of King Sports in this lawsuit, but you be the judge……

Read more

Acushnet Responds to Callaway’s Motion for Permanent Injunction… The Redacted Version Is In and It Even Contains a Reference to this Blog!

It took about a week, but the redacted version of Acushnet’s response to Callaway’s request for a permanent injunction is in! Apparently links to this blog have been pretty popular, as I have learned from Acushnet’s Brief in Opposition that “[a] Callaway sales representative has also circulated a link to Callaway’s brief, posted on a website, to Acushnet retailers.” Come on; throw me a bone, would it have killed you to say a “popular” website, or an “entertaining” website. Oh well, at least one of the exhibits (a Declaration of David Maher, the VP of US Titleist Sales) does mention the maliciously used website… see below….. Guys, come on… if you are going to use my links to talk trash about your competition, couldn’t you arrange for a sleeve of balls to show up in my mail, perhaps a set of last season’s clubs, maybe an FT-i driver? Kidding of course… (…right handed, stiff flex…)… Anyway, back to the important stuff. Acushnet’s Brief in Opposition is good. It seems to persuasively address all the issues required to oppose a permanent injunction. But, let’s face it… the only ones that are going to read the full Brief are probably attorneys that visit this site. Therefore, let me skip right to the informative and entertaining stuff, which I have conveniently formatted in a David Letterman style “Top 10” list, but with a unique “Top 6” twist. Number 6… Number 5… Number 4… Number 3… Number 2… Number 1: The best quote from the Brief probably has no legal value, but it contains some great mudslinging and I am sure that Acushnet loved to get some of Mickelson’s quotes out to the public. The following quote from the Brief refers to notes from one of Acushnet’s test sessions with Phil Mickelson in June of 2000…. Now, the teaser….. According to Acushnet, Mickelson’s quotes include reference to a “sh*tty ball” that “spins like crap.” Can you guess which ball he is referring to?

Read more

An Update on the Titleist ProV1 Patent Infringement Battle

Those that have been following the Callaway versus Acushnet golf ball litigation battle probably know that at this time there are really two key subjects that remain open. First, there are the issues associated with Callaway’s Motion for a Permanent Injunction (click here and here for the highlights). Secondly, there are the issues associated with Acushnet’s requests for “post-trial” relief (click here for the highlights).
This post deals with the second topic; namely Acushnet’s requests for “post-trial” relief. Back on January 7th Acushnet filed a document entitled “Acushnet Company’s Motion for Post-Trial Relief.” (Click HERE to read the actual document) In this motion Acushnet renewed its motion for “judgment as a matter of law” as to the invalidity of Callaway’s patents-in-suit, and moved, in the alternative, for a new trial (and/or to alter or amend the Court’s judgment as to such claims). In fact, “Acushnet Company’s Motion for Post-Trial Relief” asserts that no reasonable jury could have come to the verdict that this particular jury came to, and it enumerates several alleged errors of the Court. Yesterday Callaway filed their response to the Acushnet motion. The official title of the response is “Callaway Golf Company’s Opposition to Acushnet’s Rule 50(b) and 59 Post-Trial Motions to Reverse or Vacate the Jury’s Verdicts.” You can click HERE to read the entire response as filed. The document is 62 pages, but is manageable once you skim past the 10+ pages of Table of Contents. If you have been following the case then it is definitely worth your time to read. As with previous court filings, I am not going to summarize Callaway’s Opposition because a lot of it focuses on issues that only attorneys are interested in, but I will point out a few interesting things that I learned while reading it…….

Read more

Another Look at Patented Putting Strokes

Back in the fall I authored a post about a patented putting method. Judging from the number of page views and links to the post, I suspect a lot of golfers were surprised to learn that a putting method could be patented; although, let’s face it, the patented putting methods are a little on the unique side of things (to put it nicely). Needless to say, none of the top 10 players in the world took me up on my challenge from the last post:…….. Surprised? Me neither. Anyway, I thought that it was time to revisit the topic and take a look at another patented putting method… so here is USPN 7121954 titled “Putting Method and Putter.” Check out these figures from the patent:…….. So how do you describe it in words… easy, just check out this claim from the patent:…….. So, next time you are watching The Golf Channel see if you can spot any patent infringers (judging from the figures above… I doubt it).

Read more

Nike Golf Sued for Patent Infringement by Saso Golf

On Friday February 22nd Saso Golf filed a patent infringement complaint in the Northern District of Illinois alleging that Nike has infringed two Saso golf club patents; namely USPN 5645495 and USPN 6620055, both simply titled “Golf Club.” Click HERE to read the Complaint. It should be interesting to see how this one plays out!

Read more

Acushnet Responds to Callaway’s Motion for Permanent Injunction… Unfortunately, it is Not Accessible to the Public!

Those following the contentious Titleist ProV1 golf ball patent infringement lawsuit may have known that yesterday was Acushnet’s deadline to file their “Answering Brief” in response to Callaway’s Motion for a Permanent Injunction (click here to review). Boy, I was looking forward to some good reading material; unfortunately, 9 of the 10 filings made with the court yesterday have been filed under “seal” with the label “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSELS’ EYES ONLY.” In other words, not only can the public not see the documents, Acushnet does not want Callaway’s in-house lawyers to have access to the documents! In the big picture, this is not unusual; just disappointing because the filings probably contain from fascinating information. I am not familiar with Judge Robinson’s local rules regarding the filing of “redacted” versions of “sealed” documents, but it appears that most of the documents filed under “seal” in this case have been supplemented with a “redacted” version of the “sealed” document within 7-10 days. I will let you know if “redacted” documents are filed. Callaway now has until March 6th to file their Reply Brief (which hopefully will not be filed under seal).

Read more

Finally, A “Smart Golf Ball”!

Time to brush-up on your knowledge of ferrofluids, magnetorheological fluids, inverse magnetorheological fluids, and magnetorheological elastomers. Today a patent application published with the title “adaptive golf ball,” and describes the invention as a “smart golf ball.” OK, that got my attention. It just so happens I have been looking for a ball that can predict when I am going to hit it off the toe and then adjust accordingly. Well, come to find out… the ball disclosed in US Pub. No. 20080045358 isn’t quite as smart as I was hoping for. Oh well, how fun would golf really be if you were always in the middle of the fairway? The patent application describes the invention as…… What is so “smart” about this ball? Well, the following paragraphs from the application do a good job of explaining the concept……. Sound too good to be true?

Read more

How Well Do You Know Irons?

Ready to test your iron knowledge? No worries, this test should be easy for the avid golfer (or anyone with good analytical skills… i.e. there is a hint in the drawing). The figure below comes from a US golf club iron head design patent that issued this week to a major producer of clubs. Can you identify the brand of irons?……….

Read more

The Continued Quest to Prevent Hosel Rockets

Every golfer has at some point suffered from a case of the shanks. I know that I do at least twice a season. Judging from number of off-set wedge related patents I would say that golfers spend a lot of time thinking about how it must be a problem with the clubs; surely not the swing! I previously posted an overview of a lot of clubs directed at curing the shanks (click HERE to read). Recently a patent application published directed to another seemingly shank-resistant club. Check out these figures from US Pub. No. 20080026867 titled “Golf Club.”…….

Read more

Clubs That I Want for My Collection

I like to collect odd golf clubs. Not necessarily ones that perform particularly well; just unique clubs, most commonly odd looking clubs (shape and material). I am looking for the following clubs… right handed… condition is not critical, but they have to be able to be hit. If you have any of the clubs on my list, please shoot me an email with a photo of the club and the price. Thanks. (perhaps some day I can auction off my collection, but my auction will most likely be in the form of a garage sale rather than one at a fancy auction house)
Pre-1950: a) any metal woods, any condition, but under $150; Early 1960’s:
a) PING 1 Iron; Late 1960’s: a) Centurion Driver (the triangular or rectangular versions); Early 1990’s: a) GolfWorks Super Jumbo Straight Shooter Driver (I have found memories of seeing one of these and thinking “no one will ever buy a club with a head that big”), b) Spalding Thunder Heat Driver, c) Wilson Killer Whale Driver with Graphite Face, d) Yonex ADX 300 Driver, e) Bullet Golf Ball Company Hollow Point Driver (horseshoe shaped); Late 1990’s:
a) Accuform Golf’s “Whistler” Driver (apparently one of the earlier “geometric” drivers). Thanks.

Read more

Valentine’s Day Special: The “Sweetheart Putter”

Last Valentine’s Day I wrote about a golf ball with heart shaped dimples (click here). Ahh, so sappy and sweet! I have been keeping a published patent application a secret just for a Valentine’s Day post; or more appropriate, I doubt anyone was looking for it. Nonetheless, the application title “Sweetheart Putter” got my attention. The following figure comes from published application US Pub. No. 20080009361……. Interesting design…. I am guessing this one will be marketed to the ladies!

Read more

The Driver Recognition Test of the Day… Can You Identify This Driver?

Marketing types always say… it is all about brand recognition. I suppose “brand recognition” is slightly different than “design patent drawing recognition,” (ok, more than slightly) but they are not entirely unrelated. The following drawings come from a driver design patent that issued today to one of the big guys. Do you recognize this club?……. So, does this club have good brand recognition?

Read more

Last Week I Posted About a Fluid-Filled Bladder Golf Club Patent Application… This Week a Patent Issues on a Remarkably Similar Design… Turns Out That Smart Inventors Do Think Alike

Last week I posted about an interesting Nike patent application directed to golf clubs incorporating a fluid-filled bladder. Imagine my surprise this week when a patent issued to Fu Sheng Industrial, the world’s largest OEM manufacturer of golf club heads, directed to a remarkably similar design. The Fu Sheng patent is USPN 7326127 titled “Golf Club Head with Gas Cushion.” Check out these drawings from the patent…… Compare the Fu Sheng patent (USPN 7326127 titled “Golf Club Head with Gas Cushion”) to Nike’s published application (US Pub. No. 20080015050 titled “Golf Clubs and Golf Club Heads Having Fluid-Filled Bladders and/or Interior Chambers”). Turns out that great minds do think alike. Looks like we probably will see a club make it to market with a fluid-filled bladder.

Read more

What Gets the Testosterone Flowing on the Golf Course? (A) Hit a 300+ Yard Drive, (B) Make a Hole-in-One, or (C) Hop on Your Golf Scooter (that has “balance wheels’”) and Scurrying Around the Course

I didn’t think last week’s post regarding the 3-wheeled bag-riding golf cart could be outdone, but boy was I wrong. Last week an amazing patent issued titled “Collapsible Golf Scooter Cart Having Fold Out Balance Wheels” (USPN 7322434). A what? A golf scooter! Check out this drawing of the scooter……. How would you feel cruising around the course on this beauty?

Read more

Can You Identify These Irons? (from a major manufacturer, yet I bet you can’t identify them)

The Golf-Patents blog has tested your knowledge of iron club head design in the past. Today, let’s see if you can identify another set of irons. For frequent readers of this blog, I rate the level of difficulty of this one as ridiculously difficult. Good luck.
The figures below come from a US golf club iron head design patent that issued today to a major producer of clubs. Can you identify the brand of irons?….

Read more

If I Gave You a High Surface Friction Golf Ball Would You Expect More Spin or Less Spin When You Hit it With a Wedge? How About When Struck With Your Driver?

High surface friction golf balls… more spin or less spin? Would it make any difference whether you hit the ball with a wedge or a driver? Interesting questions, right? Well a recently published Acushnet patent application provides us with the answer. The published patent application is US Pub. No. 20080015055 titled “Golf Ball Having High Surface Friction.” Before I give you the answer, here is an interesting little bit of trivia disclosed in the patent application……. Now, for the real analytical type of golfer that may want to know more about what is meant by coefficient of friction (COF), the application explains……. And now, the answer to the questions asked above……

Read more

A Post About Fluid-Filled Bladders

If I searched patents for the term “fluid-filled bladder”… the last thing I would expect to find would be a patent application for golf irons! But that is exactly what I stumbled across recently. More specifically, it was a published patent application directed to a Nike Slingshot design containing a fluid-filled bladder. The application published as US Pub. No. 20080015050 with the title “Golf Clubs and Golf Club Heads Having Fluid-Filled Bladders and/or Interior Chambers.” The application describes the invention as…… So what fills the fluid-filled chamber? The application states that it could be filled with air, inert gases, or liquids. Check out these figures from the application…….
It will be interesting to see if a patent issues from this application, and whether such a product ever makes it to market…..

Read more

How Would You Like the Opportunity to Ride Your Golf Bag Around the Course?

Another golf invention that words just don’t do justice! Check out these figures……… The drawings come from a recently published patent application US Pub. No. 20080023236 titled “Combined Golf Caddie And Golf Cart.”
Am I nuts, or wasn’t there some problems with the roll-over potential of 3-wheel ATV’s on uneven terrain? Surely that won’t be an issue for this invention….. (I mean it looks pretty stable, right?)

Read more

A Big Week in the World of Golf Shoe Design Patents… Who Says the Golf-Patents Blog Doesn’t Cover Fashion?

I knew that title would get you interested… but seriously, this post may contain the next hot new golf shoe design and perhaps a glimpse into future FootJoy offerings. Yesterday Acushnet was granted 6 golf shoe design patents. The patents are USPN’s D560338, D560339, D560340, D560341, D560342, and D560343; all titled “Golf Shoe Upper.” Recognize any of these styles?…..

Read more

Maker of the SuperStroke Putter Grip (made famous by KJ) Sues Tacki-Mac Grips and Energy Grips for Golf Grip Patent Infringement

On Friday Stroke Solutions, Inc., maker of the SuperStroke putter grip that KJ has made famous, filed patent infringement lawsuits against Tacki-Mac Grips, Inc. and Energy Grip, Inc. in the Eastern District of Wisconsin. The actual Complaints filed with the court do not contain much information, but you can check them out HERE and HERE. The patent at the center of the dispute is USPN 6626768 titled “Putter Grip.” A few figures from the patent are found below….. I will keep you posted on this gripping patent infringement lawsuit….

Read more

The Saga Continues… Acushnet Files Motion and Brief Requesting Judgment as a Matter of Law Regarding the Invalidity of Callaway’s Patents, OR a New Trial

Last week’s post titled “Callaway Seeks Permanent Injunction… Is There A Risk That Titleist ProV1’s Will No Longer Be Available?” has obtained the distinction of being the most widely read Golf-Patents blog post of all time! Well, this one should beat it. This post is not related to Callaway’s Motion for a permanent injunction; because Acushnet has not yet filed their response. Rather, this post is directed to Acushnet’s requests for “post-trial” relief.
Back on January 7th Acushnet filed a document entitled “Acushnet Company’s Motion for Post-Trial Relief.” (Click HERE to read the actual document) In this motion Acushnet renewed its motion for “judgment as a matter of law” as to the invalidity of Callaway’s patents-in-suit, and moved, in the alternative, for a new trial (and/or to alter or amend the Court’s judgment as to such claims). In this motion Acushnet stated:……. Basically the January 7th “Acushnet Company’s Motion for Post-Trial Relief” asserts that no reasonable jury could have come to the verdict that this particular jury came to, and it enumerates several alleged errors of the Court.
Now, this week Acushnet filed a brief in support of their January 7th motion. The brief is titled “Acushnet’s Opening Brief in Support of Its Motion for Post Trial Relief.” (Click HERE to read the entire brief in support)…….. While the Brief in Support included 6 exhibits, one exhibit in particular is very interesting (click HERE to view Exhibit 4). Exhibit 4 contains almost 60 slides used during Callaway’s opening statement at trial. Any golfer will enjoy skimming through these slides. Check them out………

Read more

TaylorMade Answers Dogleg Right’s Golf Club Patent Infringement Accusations

As you will recall, last month Dogleg Right sued TaylorMade Golf alleging infringement of two of patents directed to CG customizable golf clubs. Click HERE to read a prior post on the subject. Today TaylorMade filed their Answer (click HERE to read) to the Dogleg Right Complaint (click HERE to read). TaylorMade’s Answer states that they do not infringe the Dogleg Right patents and allege that the patents are invalid. Frankly, the Answer is pretty boring and doesn’t contain any interesting tidbits of information. Essentially a boilerplate answer in response to a boilerplate complaint. Come on guys… where is the passion, the disgust, the outrage, the mudslinging… you know, the stuff that keeps a golf blog interesting?…

Read more
Advertisment ad adsense adlogger